You are here

First Session

 

Location: Bethlehem Bible College     

Date: Wednesday, 11/2/2026    

WhatsApp Image 2026-02-22 at 13.25.02 (3).jpeg

 

Discussion Workshop titled

Sectarian and Religious Fanaticism and Its Impact on Social Peace

The scientific workshop titled "Sectarian and Religious Fanaticism and Its Impact on Social Peace" was held, featuring presentations by Dr. Munther Isaac and Prof. Dr. Jamal Zaid Al-Kilani.
The session included an interactive discussion on the workshop’s key themes, with active participation from both students and faculty members.

 

 

Speech by Dr. Munther Isaac

Dr. Munther Isaac presented his keynote speech in ten points, addressing a fundamental question:

 ?Why should we engage in Muslim–Christian dialogue in Palestine

He began by emphasizing the core of faith as reflected in the words of Jesus, which place believers before a clear ethical standard. When Jesus was asked about the greatest commandment, he replied: to love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself.

This teaching establishes love of God and love of neighbor as inseparable principles. From this foundation, Dr. Isaac outlined ten key truths:

First: Muslims and Christians do not worship two different gods; there is one God. While theological understandings differ, both communities share equal human dignity and value, and are united in humanity.

Second: Theological differences are not a barrier to dialogue but a motivation for it, encouraging engagement rather than avoidance.

Third: The absence of dialogue does not create neutrality but fosters division, misunderstanding, and fear. Therefore, understanding the “other” should come directly from engagement, not from external narratives.

Fourth: Respect and openness do not weaken identity but strengthen it, as genuine faith is reflected in behavior rather than slogans.

Fifth: In Palestine, Christians and Muslims live side by side in the same cities, schools, and institutions. Drawing on the parable of the Good Samaritan, Dr. Isaac emphasized that “the neighbor” is defined by ethical action, not shared identity. He also affirmed that Palestinian Christians are indigenous to the land, not newcomers.

Sixth: Both communities face a shared existential threat, as the occupation represents a system of displacement and replacement.

Seventh: Maintaining unity is essential, as external powers often seek to frame the conflict as a religious one in order to deepen division.

Eighth: He warned against certain theological narratives that attempt to spiritualize the political situation in ways that justify or normalize injustice. He emphasized the need to distinguish between interfaith dialogue and political exploitation of religion.

Ninth: Religious extremism is a common threat to all communities, as it produces destruction rather than coexistence, and its consequences affect all sides.

Tenth: Christianity is fundamentally defined by love, as stated in the biblical teaching that “God is love.” Failure to practice love contradicts the essence of the Gospel, while loving one’s neighbor brings believers closer to its core message. Dr. Isaac concluded with a powerful statement: “We are not merely obliged to live together; we are called to live together under the oneness of God.” Following this, Prof. Dr. Jamal Zaid Al-Kilani welcomed the audience, opening his remarks by stating: “Our presence as students in this space is itself a success of the idea of dialogue and communication.” He continued the discussion from Dr. Isaac’s final point, focusing on the theme of religious extremism and intolerance.

 

Speech by Prof. Dr. Jamal Zaid Al-Kilani 

Dialogue and extremism are two opposites that cannot coexist; extremism means the exclusion of the other and the suppression of reason. God Almighty describes those who do not use their intellect by saying: “They are like cattle; rather, they are further astray.” This indicates that disabling reason leads to the violation of moral and ethical boundaries.
Religious extremism and fanaticism are both ancient and contemporary phenomena; they have always existed and continue to exist. However, our role is to work toward limiting these manifestations, as religious fanaticism and intolerance have a profound negative impact on people, leading to social fragmentation and distancing between communities. Diversity, however, is a universal divine law, as stated in the Qur’an: “And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and the diversity of your languages and your colors.” Thus, difference is a natural law, and the elimination of the other is impossible.
One of the main roots of religious extremism is the reliance on a single source of information, which is a serious flaw. Wisdom, as stated in tradition, is the lost property of the believer; wherever it is found, he is most entitled to it. Wisdom belongs ultimately to God, and the human task is to seek it diligently.
The impact of extremism on society is severe: it prevents real development, weakens institutions, and undermines social cohesion. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “This religion is strong, so approach it gently…” emphasizing moderation and balance.
Islam, since its inception, has been based on the concept of community and inclusiveness. The Prophet established in Medina a social charter affirming that all inhabitants—Muslims, Jews, Christians, and others—form one community with shared responsibility, while maintaining their distinct beliefs. Similarly, Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab stated: “Since when have you enslaved people, when their mothers gave birth to them free?” This reflects the principle of human dignity and equality. Dr. Al-Kilani further outlined key causes of religious extremism:
First, ignorance of religion’s view of life and its emphasis on mercy, ease, and universal benefit for all humanity.
Second, lack of respect for differences and failure to accept the other
Third, learning religion from unqualified sources, which leads to distorted understandings
Fourth, failure to consider contemporary realities, as life is dynamic and requires contextual understanding. Fifth, the political, social, and economic exploitation of religion
He then proposed several solutions, including:
Building a shared intellectual, cultural, and religious framework based on mutual understanding and dialogue; accepting difference and engaging with others respectfully; and respecting freedoms within a balanced and responsible framework.

 

Field Visit to the Church of the Nativity:

Accompanied by Mr. Hitham Daiq, a delegation from the An-Najah Center for Religious Studies (ANCERS) conducted a field tour in the Old City, which included a visit to the Church of the Nativity.

During the visit, the delegation explored the church and its various sections, receiving a detailed explanation of its key historical and religious landmarks, as well as the cultural and heritage symbols and elements it contains. This provided the delegation with an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the church’s religious and civilizational significance and to enhance scholarly and interfaith dialogue between the parties.